UHAMKA Proceedings Directory
Archive/INTERNATIONAL WEBINAR AND UNDERGRADUATE PAPER - 2024 (2024)

IMPACT OF TECHNICAL TEXT FEATURES ON VOCATIONAL STUDENTS' READING COMPREHENSION

Published: 8/2/2024

Abstract

This qualitative study investigates how technical text features influence the reading comprehension of vocational school students. Through interviews with 20 students, the research explores students' navigation of diagrams, charts, and specialized vocabulary in their textbooks. Findings reveal that text complexity, vocabulary knowledge, background knowledge, and text format significantly impact comprehension. Students with stronger vocabulary and background knowledge demonstrate higher comprehension levels, while those struggling with complex text structures or visual integration face challenges. The study underscores the importance of tailored interventions to address these challenges and enhance reading comprehension in vocational education. By improving students' ability to understand technical texts, educators can promote better learning outcomes and job preparedness. Future research could explore specific instructional strategies to further support vocational students in developing their reading skills.

KEYWORDS:Technical textReading comprehensionVocational educationText complexityVocabulary knowledgeTechnical textReading comprehensionVocational educationText complexityVocabulary knowledge

Full Text PDF

Document Preview

References

[1]Chang, C.-C., Tsai, L.-T., & Meliana, D. (2023). The Concept of Ocean Sustainability in High School: Measuring the Ocean Literacy of Vocational High School Students in Indonesia. Sustainability, 15(2), 1043.Fletcher, M. (2018). The Impact Of Literature Circles On The ReadingComprehension Of English Language Learners. University of South Carolina.Fulgueras, M. J., & Bautista, J. (2020). Flipped classroom: its effects on ESL learners’ criticalhinking and Reading comprehension levels. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 2(3), 257–270.Gu, J., & Ding, R. (2022). Digital Literacy of Chinese Normal Students: A Literature Review. In Digital Literacy for Teachers(pp. 191–210). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-1738-7_10Johansson, E. (2022). Development of critical thinking and language proficiency among undergraduate Swedish online EFL students. In Educare(Issue 4, pp. 50–71). Malmo University. https://doi.org/10.24834/educare.2022.4.3Kortüm, G. (2012). Reflectance spectroscopy: principles, methods, applications. Springer Science & Business Media.Manuel, M. E. (2017). Vocational and academic approaches to maritime education and training (MET): Trends, challenges and opportunities. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 16, 473–483.Moodie, G. (2002). Identifying vocational education and training. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 54(2), 249–266.Nation, I. S. P., & Macalister, J. (2020). Teaching ESL/EFL reading and writing. Routledge.Saldana, J. (2014). Thinking qualitatively: Methods of mind. SAGE publications.Smeets, D. J. H., & Bus, A. G. (2012). Interactive electronic storybooks for kindergartners to promote vocabulary growth. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 112(1), 36–55.Street, B. (2011). New literacy studies and the continua of biliteracy. Educational Linguistics in Practice: Applying the Local Globally and the Global Locally, United Kingdom: Multilingual Matters, 59–67.Thomas, K. S. C. (2021). Critical Thinking. In Research Anthology on Developing Critical Thinking Skills in Students(pp. 157–178). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3022-1.ch010Ünaldı, İ., & Yüce, E. (2020). The Relationship Among Vocabulary Size, Grammar Proficiency, and Critical Thinking Skills of Adult Language Learners. In Adult Learning(Vol. 32, Issue 2, pp. 70–78). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1045159520959473Yilmaz, K. (2013). Comparison of quantitative and qualitative research traditions: Epistemological, theoretical, and methodological differences. European Journal of Education, 48(2), 311–325.