The Use of Google Translate in Enhancing EFL Students’ Writing Skills
Published: 7/7/2025
Abstract
This study investigates the impact of Google Translate (GT), an AI-powered translation tool, on the writing skills of EFL (English as a Foreign Language) high school students in Jakarta, Indonesia. Employing a mixed-methods approach, the research includes quantitative data from 200 students via a Likert-scale questionnaire and qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with 10 students. The findings reveal that students generally perceive GT as helpful, especially for vocabulary acquisition and comprehension. However, there is a negative correlation between students’ writing performance and their reliance on GT. Overuse of GT may hinder critical thinking and reduce students’ independent writing skills. Furthermore, some students demonstrate strategies to reduce dependence on GT and engage in self-learning through traditional dictionaries, media exposure, and reading. Teachers also emphasize the need for guided use of GT. The study concludes that GT can support EFL learning if it is integrated carefully, complementing rather than replacing independent language practice.
Full Text PDF
Document Preview
References
[1]Andari, A. Z., Sofyan, R., & Yusuf, M. (2022). The The Teachers’ Perception towards the Use of Google Translate as a Translation Tool. RADIANT: Journal of Applied, Social, and Education Studies, 3(1), 1–14.Anwar, K., Ubaidillah, M. F., Tarrayo, V. N., Ismiatun, F., Khotimah, K., Irawansyah, I., & Sulistiyo, U. (2020). Orientations in learning English as a foreign language: How do Indonesian students view them. EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 5(1), 32–42.Bimo Walgito, B. W. (2004). Pengantar Psikologi Umum. Andi.Campbell, M. (2019). Teaching academic writing in higher education. Education Quarterly Reviews, 2(3).Chiu, T. K. F., Moorhouse, B. L., Chai, C. S., & Ismailov, M. (2024). Teacher support and student motivation to learn with Artificial Intelligence (AI) based chatbot. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(7), 3240–3256.Groves, M., & Mundt, K. (2015a). Friend or foe? Google Translate in language for academic purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 112–121.Groves, M., & Mundt, K. (2015b). Friend or foe? Google Translate in language for academic purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 37, 112–121.Kim, N. J., & Kim, M. K. (2022). Teacher’s perceptions of using an artificial intelligence-based educational tool for scientific writing. Frontiers in Education, 7, 755914.Medvedev, G. (2016). Google translate in teaching English. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 4(1), 181–193.Mufida, H. A., & Kuswardani, R. (2023). EFL STUDENTS’PERCEPTION OF PVN (PERSONAL VOCABULARY NOTES) AS A VOCABULARY LEARNING STRATEGY. SEAQIL Journal of Language Education, 2(1), 10–19.Mulyani, M., & Afina, F. (2021). THE STUDENTS’ ATTITUDE TOWARDS GOOGLE TRANSLATE. The Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(1).Mun, C. (2024). EFL learners’ English writing feedback and their perception of using ChatGPT. STEM Journal, 25(2), 26–39.Oyun-Erdene, E., & Bulgantamir, D. (2025). STUDENTS’RELIANCE ON AI TOOLS IN EFL COURSES IN HIGHER EDUCATION: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES. AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES, 40.
[2]Pawlak, M. (2021). Investigating language learning strategies: Prospects, pitfalls and challenges. Language Teaching Research, 25(5), 817–835.Pham, A., Nguyen, Y., Tran, L., Huynh, K., Le, N., & Huynh, P. (2022). University students’ perceptions on the use of Google Translate: Problems and solutions. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 17(4), 79–94.Pitcher, G. (2015). Theory of perception. Princeton University Press.Polat, İ., & Dedeoğlu, H. (2024). The Effect of Writing about Immediate Environment and Experiences on Narrative and Informative Text Writing Skills. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 40(3), 251–267.Price, P. C., Jhangiani, R. S., & Chiang, I.-C. A. (2015). Reliability and validity of measurement. Research Methods in Psychology.Sumakul, D. T. Y. G., Hamied, F. A., & Sukyadi, D. (2022). Artificial Intelligence in EFL Classrooms: Friend or Foe?. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(1), 232–256.Sürücü, L., & Maslakci, A. (2020). Validity and reliability in quantitative research. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(3), 2694–2726.Teng, M. F. (2024). “ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies”: EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in using ChatGPT for feedback in writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100270.Ting, F. K., & Tan, K. H. (2021). Enhancing English Language Vocabulary Learning among Indigenous Learners through Google Translate. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 8(2), 143–148.Tsai, S.-C. (2019). Using google translate in EFL drafts: a preliminary investigation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5–6), 510–526.Valizadeh, M. (2020). The effect of comprehensive written corrective feedback on EFL learners’ written syntactic accuracy. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 11(1), 17–26.Wei, L. K. (2021a). The use of Google Translate in English language learning: How students view it. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society, 3(1), 47–53.Wei, L. K. (2021b). The use of Google Translate in English language learning: How students view it. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society, 3(1), 47–53.Zou, K. H., Tuncali, K., & Silverman, S. G. (2003). Correlation and simple linear regression. Radiology, 227(3), 617–628.