IDENTIFIKASI KESIAPSIAGAAN RENCANA KONTINJENSI MENGHADAPI BAHAYA GAGAL TEKNOLOGI DI LINGKUNGAN KAMPUS B UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH PROF. DR. HAMKA

Published: 3/24/2018

Abstract

This study alayses the failure of technology at UHAMKA Pasar Rebo campus, Kampung Rambutan, East Jakarta . The objectives of the study are to see the potencial failure of technology hazard at FKIP campus and to identify preparedness which have by institution. This study used a method that has been used to interprete theimage and digital elevation model SRTM with qualitative approach. Part of way doing identify of hazard zones and mapping hazard zone area especially data of hazard disater such as vulnerability of fire, leak of outer intake and derivate of earthquake impact. Then point of focus study are estimate have high category hazard. The next identification to assess UHAMKA contigency by HIRAC methods uses a way with describe early danger and continued from system which using and other impact as derivate of hazard. Finally focus of reviewing UHAMKA draft of policy contigency to handle of hazard disaster and accindent. The result show’s that FKIP’s Campus have hazard potency are fire, failure technology equpiment. There’s no UHAMKA contigency plan draft which to mitigation for hazard disaster or accident as policy institution for rules of safety direction of building

Full Text PDF

Document Preview

References

[1]Basrowi dan Suwandi.2008.Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
[2]hal.209.
[3]BNPB. 2012. Peraturan Kepala BNPB no 02 Tahun 2012tentang Pedoman Pengkajian
[4]Risiko Bencana. Jakarta.
[5]BPBD Provinsi DKI Jakarta, 2017 . (diakses pada senin
[6]Januari 2017, 20.00 WIB).
[7]Cahyono, AB. 2010. Keselamatan Kerja Bahan Kimia di Industri. Yogyakarta:UGM
[8]press
[9]Holmgren, M. 2006. Maintenance Related Incindents and Accidents:Aspects of Hazard
[10]Identification. Doctoral Thesis:Luleå University of Technology
[11]Pemerintah Provinsi DKI Jakarta, 2015. Peraturan Daerah no 7 Tahun 2011.
[12]Nugroho, SP. 2010. Karakteristk Kegagalan Teknologi. Jurnal Kebencanaan. BNPB.
[13]Rosyidin, Wira F. 2015. Kajian Dampak Bahaya Kegagalan Teknologi PLTU/PLTGU
[14]terhadap Elemen Berisiko di Lingkungan Unit Pembangkitan
[15]Muarakarang.Naskah Publikasi. Sekolah Pasca Sarjana UGM. Yogyakarta.
[16]Saedi, AM. Thambirajah, JJ. Pariatamby, A. 2014. A HIRACRC Model for Safety and
[17]Risk Evaluation at a Hydroelectric Power Generation Plant.Journal of Safety
[18]Science. Elsevier. Vol 70.
[19]Thywissen, K. 2006. Components of Risk A ComparativeGlossary.SOURCE.Publication
[20]Series of UNU-EHS.No.2
[21]UHAMKA Jakarta. 2017, <http://www.uhamka.ac.id. ( diakses pada senin 4 Januari
[22],21.00 WIB.)
[23]UNISDR, 2015, 2015 Disaster Number, <http://www.unisdr.org/we/inform/
[24]publications/47804.
[25]UNU-ITC. 2011, Multi-hazard risk assessment, Enschede:UNU-ITC: Netherland,
[26]Guiede. Book.Version 2011.
[27]USDL. 2002. Job Hazard Analysis. OSHA.,3071(Revised).U.S.Department of Labor.
[28]Van Westen, C. 2005. Multihazard Risk Assessment.UNU-ITC-DGIM. ITC, The
[29]Netherlands.
[30]Yunus, H, Sabari. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian Wilayah Kontemporer. Yogyakarta:
[31]Pustaka Pelajar